WHO Rams Through Orwellian Policies in Defiance of Own Rules

Freedom lovers have repeatedly warned that the disastrous amendments to the World Health Organization (WHO) treaty must not be passed, as they would essentially give unelected WHO elites the power to control and dictate all policies of every participating member country (including America) in the event of an alleged pandemic. Unfortunately, in violation of its own rules, some members of the World Health Assembly just pushed through dystopian updates to the International Health Regulations (IHR).

So much for the four month review requirement and the necessity for an actual vote. The WHO declared its last-minute insider conclave achieved “consensus,” and the citizens of the world are accordingly shivved in the back, as Robert Malone’s Substack reported. You can read many more details there, but below is one section that is particularly illuminating on how disastrous these updates could prove:

‘The hastily approved IHR consolidate virtually unchecked authority and power of the Director-General to declare public health emergencies and pandemics as he/she may choose to define them, and thereby to trigger and guide allocation of global resources as well as a wide range of public health actions and guidances. These activities include recommendations relating to “persons, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods and postal parcels”, but based on earlier draft language of proposed IHR amendments and the WHO pandemic “accord” are likely to extend to both invasive national surveillance and mandated public health “interventions” such as vaccines and non-pharmaceutical interventions such as social distancing and lockdowns.

[ ]Not to mention the continuing weaponization of public health messaging via censorship of dissenting voices and liberal use of the fear-based tactics known as information or psychological bioterrorism to mobilize public opinion in favor of WHO objectives…Article 35 details the requirements of “Health Documents,” including those in digital format. The system of digital health documents is consistent with, and in my opinion a precursor to, the Digital IDs described by the World Economic Forum [WEF].’

This is another danger I have highlighted before, especially since the Biden administration is among the countries that have signed onto a plan to launch digital IDs and digital currency. In China, digital IDs such as WEF wants and describes are required to do or buy anything. Political dissidents can have their lives instantaneously frozen if their QR code turns red. Healthcare, food, voting, travel—everything connected to one digital ID subject to the whims of Marxist elites.

Basically, the WHO can declare health emergencies for any or every reason, and then dictate to all of us thousands of miles away where we can go, what we can do, what protocols we must submit to, and so forth. The only hope for America as long as Democrats control the country is if individual states enact laws against following this preposterous IHR. We can only pray that the WHO is not about to try Covid lockdowns 2.0.