The Dangerous WHO Treaty Could Institutionalize Lockdowns Permanently
The Dangerous WHO Treaty Could Institutionalize Lockdowns Permanently
“The future isn’t just happening. The future is built by us.” —Klaus Schwab, addressing the World Economic Forum’s Davos conference
Two experts on Steve Bannon’s War Room May 20 laid out some of the reasons the proposed WHO treaty, which would involve countries handing over the power to make decisions for a “pandemic” almost entirely over to the World Health Organization (WHO), is so dangerous.
“The WHO plans to finalize the treaty by 2024. It will aim to shift governing authority now reserved to sovereign states to the WHO during a pandemic by legally binding member states to the WHO’s revised International Health Regulations. . .the treaty would also allow the WHO unilaterally to determine what constitutes a pandemic and declare when a pandemic is occurring.”
Don’t underestimate the determination of globalist organizations such as World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO, and the Gates Foundation to try and remake the world as we know it, transforming it into an authoritarian, tyrannical dystopia. Brownstone Institute’s Jeffrey Tucker explained how the WHO treaty would essentially institutionalize the nightmare of lockdowns:
“Let me just summarize. If—if you loved the way governments have treated you for the last two years, then you’re going to love this treaty and these new regulations that are coming down from the World Health Organization, because the idea is to make it a permanent state of the world; and to make situations like Sweden, which had a very light touch on the pandemic, and had much better results than anybody else on the planet Earth, to make that almost impossible. So every state now has a great excuse, ‘We’re just locking you down because that’s what the World Health Organization says we’re supposed to do because there’s a pandemic, from—from the monkeypox’ or whatever the next big thing is, so it’s extremely dangerous.”
The Brownstone Institute has a piece on their site giving a more detailed analysis of the treaty and why it’s such a bad idea. Part of the story is that “The WHO Treaty Is Tied to a Global Digital Passport and ID System.” That means:
“As part of this plan, the WHO has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system, with plans to link every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID.”
WEF’s similar plan for a digital ID would require use of the ID to buy or do anything. The WHO treaty would allow the WHO to censor alleged “disinformation” as well, indicating the globalists’ desire to control the entire digital and internet universe.
Center for Security Policy’s Frank Gaffney told Bannon that Tucker was “exactly right,” and added, “We actually have seen the World Health Organization at work,” with all of the “nightmares” of the Covid lockdowns. Gaffney said that WHO head Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus is “owned by the Chinese Communist Party,” and thus “brought us the pandemic 1.0 response.” He continued:
“It turns out it [pandemic 1.0 response] bears a striking resemblance to the so-called ‘China Model’—the lockdowns, the quarantines, the use of mostly untested, and, it turns out, dangerous vaccines, the requirement that you be jabbed by them, and then the enforcement mechanism for the jabbing; namely, these vaccine passports. That’s—[Tucker,] he’s exactly right. If you liked how that looked, you’re going to love what the newly-empowered Tedros and World Health Organization will do for the next time.”
And, as Gaffney noted, how do we know that, in future, such powers will be limited to “pandemics?” The globalist elites can invent a crisis whenever they want, after all. They’ve proven that all too clearly.