A Connecticut judge just threw out the results of a Democrat primary election due to video evidence of ballot stuffing. But filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza exposed far more egregious ballot stuffing and trafficking for the 2020 election—and both Democrats and many Republicans deny that the video evidence D’Souza obtained is proof of a fraudulent election.
The Western Journal reported Nov. 2 on how Superior Court Judge William Clark has tossed out the results from a September Democrat primary, which had previously been declared for Democrat Mayor Joe Ganim. Ganim “defeated” his challenger John Gomes by a mere 251 votes from absentee ballots (Gomes was leading in the in-person ballots). But after video evidence surfaced of an alleged supporter of Ganim stuffing ballots in an absentee ballot drop box, Clark decided that the “volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary.”
Gomes had brought a lawsuit against the results that gave Ganim the “victory.” It is key to note that Connecticut law requires that only a voter himself—or someone specifically designated by a voter—can deliver an absentee ballot at a drop box. While multiple Republican candidates in Arizona have brought lawsuits against the highly questionable “results” of the 2022 election, the results have not been thrown out (I personally published testimony of ballot trafficking in Arizona). Furthermore, there was video evidence of ballot fraud in 2020 in Georgia, and yet the media still overwhelmingly tells us not to believe our lying eyes, that the video does not show fraud. Trump is facing a federal indictment for saying the 2020 election was fraudulent. It seems only Democrat candidates can successfully sue against and overturn voter fraud in the U.S.
Note that Ganim’s “victory” was thrown out based on evidence of ballot stuffing at drop boxes. But there’s evidence indicating that Donald Trump could have won multiple swing states and thus the presidency in 2020 had it not been for Democrat ballot trafficking.
D’Souza’s and True the Vote’s 2000 Mules did prove—in my opinion, beyond doubt—that there were more fraudulent votes in states Joe Biden had to win, just looking at ballot trafficking, than Biden won by. As D’Souza said in the movie, “Shockingly, even this narrow way of looking at just our 2000 mules [ballot traffickers] in these swing states gives Trump the win with 279 electoral votes to Biden’s 259.” And 2000 Mules had plenty of video evidence.
Stolen elections have consequences. It’s encouraging that one Connecticut judge agrees, but judges all the way up to the Supreme Court should have been equally concerned about 2020 and 2022 election fraud—especially considering how disastrous Joe Biden’s presidency has been for America and the world.
The 2020 steal was handled in such a professional manner, definitely according to a well-rehearsed plan that included at least eleven avenues of very well-considered fraud: media onslaught against Donald Trump, ballot stuffing, multiple ballots by mail to one person or a person who was either dead or did not exist, registration lists that were deliberately fraudulent, suppression of obvious corruption (Biden family), illegal donations by tech/pharma, voting machines connected to internet routers outside, and inside, the USA, no serious consideration of thousands of signed affidavits of those who had witnessed poling place fraud, lack or suppression of surveillance of voting places, voting procedure arbitrarily changed without legislative approval, extension of voting periods (and the list goes on and on); so that I have changed my mind. Not only am I absolutely convinced that 2020 was totally rigged, I also doubt very much that Barack Obama was legitimately elected, at least for his second term. The 2020 fraud was simply too slick. It had obviously been practiced before.