Is Big Tech Joining the Media in Covering for Waukesha Mass Murder Suspect?
The Facebook account of Waukesha murder suspect Darrell Brooks, who turned a Christmas parade into a nightmare scene of death and injury (including for multiple children), is now no longer able to be accessed.
First of all, look at this picture of Brooks and see if you can figure out why the media might cover for this criminal but call Kyle Rittenhouse a “white supremacist”:
“Darrell Brooks, 39, who has an extensive criminal past, faces five counts of first-degree intentional homicide in the vehicular rampage that left five people, ranging in age from 39 to 81, dead and 48 others injured.
The aspiring rapper posted songs with explicit lyrics on SoundCloud, including an anti-Trump and anti-police song called ‘X.’
‘This that f–k Donald Trump flow and whoever hate it,’ he raps in the song uploaded to the platform three years ago.
‘Now let me talk about the b—h we call the president, a closet racist and he play his part so effortless,’ he continues. . .Another of his songs contained the lyrics, ‘They gonna need a cleaner for the s— we did, all my killers Gacey where them bodies hid,’ as well as ‘Sliding through the city with no safety on,’ according to the report.
Brooks’ songs on his since-deleted YouTube channel also reportedly mentioned AK-47 assault rifles and included one called ‘Gon Kill U,’ the Sun reported Monday. [Emphasis added]”
And Brooks was out on bail after “he ran over a woman he had a child with,” on what even authorities have since admitted was too low bail.
When I went to Brooks' reported Twitter account the latest post was from 2018, which is interesting—I wonder if tweets have been deleted? Did he simply not use Twitter very much? Possible, of course. At any rate, here's the account's pinned tweet (Malcolm X was a radical Communist activist) for the record:
The vile tweet has not been censored by Twitter, of course.
But there are also apparently a number of concerning Facebook posts from Brooks (aka rapper "MathBoi Fly"), including multiple in support of a radical BLM/Antifa-style narrative—except now you cannot access Brooks' account or his videos on Facebook.
Again, perhaps a family member managed to block access to the account. But considering how all the institutions, including law enforcement, were essentially playing cover-up for Brooks (the same institutions, like the media, saying vile and violence-inciting falsehoods about Kyle Rittenhouse), one has to wonder if Facebook is covering up too. After all, Facebook censored facts about and support for Kyle Rittenhouse, favoring outright lies instead, and Facebook also censored evidence linking Covid-19 origins to a Wuhan, China lab. YouTube has outrageously censored Covid-19 information. If woke YouTube and Facebook were covering for a criminal because he doesn’t fit a certain narrative, would it really be that shocking?
Okay, so we don’t know that the attack was race-fueled, or politically-fueled. I’m not making any certain accusations here. I just want to say this all seems like relevant evidence, especially since the mainstream media and leftists have been deliberately fueling, encouraging, and praising violence for over a year now, including after the Rittenhouse verdict (which Brooks posted about, according to NY Post).
But the media and other leftists who screamed hysterical garbage about Rittenhouse have already been running interference to cover for Brooks.
ABC News claimed that the massively-damaging rampage of Brooks may have been just an accident as Brooks fled from the scene of another crime, claiming law enforcement were their sources. I think it safe to call that a patently ridiculous claim.
Remember how Biden labeled Kyle Rittenhouse a “white supremacist” without (presumably) bothering to look up the facts (and of course there was ample video evidence taken that night)? Yesterday Biden did not mention Darrell Brooks’ name or race, warning cautiously that not all facts were in yet. Now, Biden was right that not all the facts are in (though I don’t see how that prevents Biden from mentioning Brooks’ name), but why this sudden cautious tone? And for a man arguably a mass murderer who ran over children and killed grandmothers, no less?
Also interesting that Donald Trump came out with a strong statement of sympathy for the victims and condemnation for the murderous rampage before Joe Biden issued a weaker statement (including reportedly not using the word "Christmas" though the tragedy occurred at a Christmas parade). Some crazy leftists even used the horrific Waukesha tragedy to mock the Rittenhouse verdict. Nothing like making a joke out of the deaths and injuries of children and families while supporting a pedophile and felon who were killed by Rittenhouse in self-defense!
So is Big Tech complicit in covering up for a man who is a mass murderer? Well, we don't know for sure right now, but, considering this story hardly helps a leftist narrative, I honestly wouldn't be surprised.
NOTE: The opinions in this article are personal.