“SICK: Eighth Grade Students In Idaho Shown Condom Video With Simulated Sex As Part Of Planned Parenthood-Endorsed Program.” This isn’t an isolated incident, either. Back in June 2021, I did an exposé for The National Pulse on the Human Sexuality and Responsibility (HSR) curriculum in use in the Austin, Texas Independent School District. But the Austin program was based off the National Sex Education Standards, which were meant for the whole US, and were developed with the help and advice of Planned Parenthood. They included disturbing sexual content similar to the Idaho condom video.
“[Gateway Pundit] The Idaho Freedom Foundation (IFF) broke a shocking story regarding kids at Moscow Middle School being shown an animated video with sex scenes between a man and a woman as part of a Planned Parenthood-approved sex education program. The video also included highly inappropriate comments from the female narrator.
The video was part of a Planned Parenthood-endorsed sex education program which is implemented in public schools by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and by individual health districts. Public records requests reveal that the video was shown for multiple years as part of the sex education program known as Reducing the Risk.
Use of the video and other materials obtained by IFF indicates violation of Idaho law and standards, which require all sex education taught in public schools to reinforce traditional family arrangements and teach abstinence. The video definitely does not promote abstinence.”
I won’t include the video transcript, which is highly inappropriate for eight graders. How is this not sexual grooming?
But, as mentioned above, the National Sex Education Standards and Austin’s 2021 curriculum based on those standards included highly explicit content as well. While I cannot say for certain that the exact content below is still in the curriculum, Austin continues to have the Human Sexuality and Responsibility (HSR) content on its website and, as of the October 2022 update, was still using the National Sex Education Standards as basis. So I think we can say safely that at least some of the sexually explicit and pro-LGBTQ content below is still being used in Austin schools. Below are some excerpts from my National Pulse exposé:
“The standards state that by the end of second grade (ages 7 and 8), students should be able to ‘identify different kinds of family structures,’ and know the names for body parts ‘including male and female anatomy.’ [Third grade teachers were also supposed to describe the different functions of sexual organs and read role-plays about uncomfortable touching with students, including a seeming sexual harassment situation.]
By the end of high school, students should be able to ‘describe the human sexual response cycle,’ and ‘differentiate between biological sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity and expression’…
By sixth grade, HSR calls for teachers to describe and discuss ‘sexual contact & sexual intercourse’ as part of the class on ‘ABSTINENCE TO PREVENT PREGNANCY.’
Part of this lesson is an activity where teachers hand out cards describing various actions so students can identify which are part of abstinence and which are not, including different types of sexual activity such as ‘oral sex.’ Teachers are advised to tell students, if the topic comes up, that masturbation does not result in pregnancy or ‘health problems’ but may not be approved by some families or religions.
Sixth graders also have a lesson on STDs/STIs and HIV in which the teacher describes how these diseases happen and are transmitted.
One class handout for seventh graders includes instructions on how to use a male condom properly, including drawings and instructions on how to put on a condom and take it off.
In eighth grade, a class handout includes not only instructions on condom use but also a list of various contraceptive methods and accompanying images.”
But the National Sex Education Standards and Austin’s curriculum didn’t just want essentially to encourage children to sexual promiscuity; they also included plenty of material to confuse children about sex and gender and encourage them to think that transgenderism is normal and acceptable.
“The first lesson plan is for third graders is ‘Identity,’ and involves an exercise where students are asked if anyone ever called them a ‘wrong name’ relative to their identity. There is also a lesson on ‘Identity’ for fourth graders.
The fifth grade ‘Identity’ lesson plan instructs the teacher to ‘Define sexual orientation as the romantic attraction of an individual to someone of the same gender or a different gender.’ The fifth grade lesson plan also includes the definitions ‘Gender: the way a person identifies him/herself in relation to being male, female, neither, or both,’ and ‘Sexual orientation: the romantic attraction of an individual to someone of the same gender or a different gender.’ The teacher is then supposed to explain to the fifth graders that ‘gender and sexual orientation varies from one person to the next… Confusion about gender and sexual orientation is normal.’”
You get the idea. You can read more about the above content at The National Pulse on the Austin schools website, and go to the Gateway Pundit for more details on the inappropriate Idaho video.
Children’s innocence is worth preserving. Sexual perverts are trying to corrupt children, and we need to call it out for what it is.
I call bullshit.
None of those links go anywhere, and the Texas sex ed system has been a joke for decades. Abstinence only sex ed didn't help anyone, just gave a few of us stuff to laugh about.
I am disgusted that this going in my state that is supposed to be conservative and religious.