Covid Vax Fetal Tissue: Is Pfizer Vax Linked to Infanticide?
The Pfizer Covid vaccine is indeed linked to aborted fetal tissue, as a Pfizer whistleblower confirmed to James O'Keefe of Project Veritas. But bad as that is, a Gateway Pundit exclusive put an even more horrific context on that fetal tissue: it may well be the result of infanticide.
That statement sounds like conspiracy nonsense. I know that. Look at the facts, however:
"On October 6, with the help of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas (PV), a whistleblower at Pfizer revealed, in leaked internal emails, that company executives have been, in PV’s words, 'telling staff to be secretive about the use of human fetal tissue in laboratory testing of the COVID vaccine.'
The video cites an email from the company’s senior director of worldwide research admitting that ‘One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.’ The firm’s chief scientific officer specifically identifies the cell line involved as ‘HEK293T cells … (which) are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus.'"
Gateway Pundit notes that even the hierarchy of the Catholic Church (which rightly and usually warns against vaccines linked to aborted fetal tissue) has shown enthusiastic support for the Covid vax. Such vaccines are not uncommonly developed, however, and Pfizer's line of cells is particularly in fairly common use. Why hide Pfizer's links to aborted fetal tissue, then? Why wouldn’t the company defend the use? It seems superfluous to hide. Unless. . .
"The details of HEK293’s brutal – and from all appearances, until very recently, largely undisclosed – origins explain the company’s deep discomfort. Contrary to nearly a half-century of misrepresentation and obfuscation, HEK293’s creation did NOT arise from an 'abortion' as everyday people understand it.
A very recent development serves to confirm this.
In August, the University of Pittsburgh effectively made a horrifying admission. The Center for Medical Progress, which had to enlist the help of Judicial Watch before the university would respond to its Freedom of Information Act request, explained that the school’s GUDMAP program (full name: GenitoUrinary Development Molecular Anatomy Project), with the help of area Planned Parenthood abortion providers, was 'allowing babies, some of the age of viability, to be delivered alive, and then killing them by cutting their kidneys out.'"
Killing a baby in the womb is already horrific murder. But actually deliberately waiting until the baby is born to kill it through live organ harvesting--that makes even some abortion advocates queasy.
"Everyone reading this article should surely agree that once a baby is delivered alive, killing it should no longer be considered an abortion. Killing a delivered-alive baby is textbook infanticide. . .The HEK293 line was created in the early 1970s. Months before the University of Pittsburgh’s admissions, AnnaMaria Cardinalli, an extraordinarily perceptive and conscientious writer, detailed the damning truth about its origins at Crisis Magazine in January:
… To harvest a viable embryonic kidney … sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which would lessen the viability of the organs. . .
In the decades since HEK293’s creation, its two most directly involved scientists, Drs. Alex van der Eb and Franklin Graham, have been vague in explaining the cell line’s origins [trying without much success to come up with reasonable explanations not based in abortion]. . .In the meantime, it’s indefensible that an employer or government entity should attempt to force individuals to get jabbed or lose their jobs or forfeit other privileges based on a vaccine whose development [may have] originated in infanticide."
I have two questions to ask: firstly, in light of this new evidence, how is the hierarchy of the Catholic Church possibly justifying to themselves their push of this vaccine (the Vatican is even trying to force it on employees)? We need to know more before we can be certain the vax is morally permissible. And secondly, if US scientists engage in live organ harvesting in relation to vaccines being oppressively shoved onto (or into) the American public, what exactly gives us the moral high ground over the Chinese Communist Party?